>>513697505
That is called (traditoinal) Empire, and thats a good thing. The modern bourgeoisie nation-state is an anti-traditional abomination, and a stepping-stone to inter-nationalism. It is no coincidence that the same liberals and capitalists who ended the traditional monarchies and empire of Europe (and who try to do the same against the remaining empires) are the same group who now dismantle their own creation (the bourgeoisie nation-state) in favour of inter-national globalism (once their capital, unshackeled from the traditonal monarchy-church, have outgrown their "containers").

Free Europe should be an Empire too, not in the homogenizing EU way (based on "universal" liberal-globalist values) but akin the Holy Roman Empire. Something "above" the multiplicity of peoples, not a "large (homogenizing) nation state".
This is what the Third Reich tried, and catastrophically failed, to do (due to the modernity of fascism/nazism (petty nationalism)).

>>513697541
>1. How are Russia and/or China "radical feminist"?
>2. Why should I care what Russians do in Russia or Chinese do in China? They dont enforce their alleged "radical feminist" values as "objective" and "universal" on us in any way.
You seem confused.