>>17928523
>In other words
Nope, I already used one standard but you just ignored it. Anyway it's very clear you are being deceptive right now.
>You absolutely require hypostases in order to have omnipotence.
You haven't demonstrated that. And actually by your own logic neither is the godhead omnipotent. He can't let Satan make himself greater and then send his "core" to hell
>None of them are mindless.
Yes they are if they are not conscious, which you don't know.
>pick whatever word
Words have meanings and part is the closest but even then your usage confuses part whole relations.
> is just a way something reflects light
No it isn't, you can have red emissive objects for example. Redness is just an abstract idea like numbers that don't exist individually on their own.
>So is it, or not?
It isn't, it's just a part of Malcolm the same way the sector is just a part of the circle.
>He doesn't, and never has.
Then Jesus was never tempted and he is not like us
>You haven't yet quoted it.
Are you stupid? I am using the very same text you are using and simply giving it an interpretation that is different from yours
>>17928536
>A)
I've argued in a separate thread about the eternal validity of God's law no need to bring that here. it still is a rejection of Moses if you claim God's law is optional.
>B)
I am working under your paradigm, it's an internal critique.
>C)
Irrelevant and you are not close, I am an orthodox/sunni muslim. Now let's see how you are going to desperately try to shift the conversation into one about my religion.