>>718897578
>Can you describe what force is acting on the pole
Yes, the very pole itself, necessitate by the fact of it's movement in a stationary room and the movement continuing behind it, another question, which would perhaps illustrate it even better would be if you had not just one box but 2 stacked on top of each other, then you would have to ask he would answer A., would box one not launch box two as it is fully on the other side? I think the one that would answer A. would be hard pressed to deny rapid movement of an object out of the exit portal wouldn't force soemthing out of it's way to get out. All of these things I think invariably and a giant arrown pointing directly at the answer being B, down to the intimate contradiction between the premise of the A. answer and the premise of the existence of portals.

At what point do you apply physics on the exit end of the portal? You can't answer the quesiton in a way that deletes portals, so then the question becomes where the continuity lies between the end of portal 1 and 2, which I've yet to hear those that would answer A. (who I will now call A. fags, not for argument but for expediency) give any account for whatsoever. My contention lies in the fact that I have on the other hand, formed a theory.-