>>717609475
Good and evil literally don't exist in any moral system outside a Christian or Zoroastrian one (Christianity got it from Zoroastrianism)
Not in Buddhism, not in Daoism, not in Judaism, not in Egypt, not in Japan, not in Aztecism, not in Roman-ism, not in Norse ism, not in anything, certainly not in secularism
>but there are antagonists and vices n shit
those are not 'evil'
evil has a strict meaning
otherwise 'grey morality' wouldn't even be theoretically conceivable

>>716460151
its D ITS FUCKING D AND I CAN PROVE IT


if you follow a chess knight pattern, form any tile, that is
XYX
XXX
XXX

XYX
XYX
XXX

XYX
XYX
XXY

the final destination ALWAYS has 2 shapes from the first 2 Ys
You can test it with TOPMIDDLE MIDDLE BOTTOM RIGHT
and LEFT MIDDLE BOTTOM RIGHT (its the side brackets)
what happens on bottom left and top left is that the 'same symbol' (for top left) overlaps itself, and for bottom right its "topline+bottom line" combined with "just top line"
thank you for coming to my TED talk