>>41042128
what you actually did though is assure me i would know tribulation in the future, then say tribulation is not suffering only to double back and say its hardship ive already know. this is what happens when you let someone else tell you what to think poorly, you dont even have A position

>>40857982
<3
if youd have asked me
>how do you recognize a moment
id have replied the incontinences of its momentum, after imbibing your reply i believe were very much on the same page

>>40554139
nope, cant measure contents that changes scale as a function of proximity to the continence, meowences or otherwise. its like saying the speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s - fucking retarded