>>537744048
>I googled a combat rig so that means you can fit twenty monster cans on top of an entire combat load without a backpack without any issues at all.
You know a full combat load is a lot more than what's in that picture, right? And that's all without a "Support weapon". Modern soldiers are already pushing the limits on how much they can carry without fucking over their ability to move, let alone fight. As in just 10 to 15 pounds grace, and that's WITH backpacks. And I guarantee you those rail rounds weight AT LEAST a pound each.
>You are a giant space marine guy in it
Not in odst you aren't
>because Gaylo is a bing bing wahoo baby's first console shooter game
Well that's a fine greeting for all the new divers. Not to mention just a horrifically hypocritical, douchbag way to make an argument.
>dUr, tHaT gAmE R BabBee gAmE sO DoNT CoUnT!
Really endearing yourself and making your argument feel worth listening to
>A belt of those around your waist
Ah yes, with all that free waist space being taken up by all the things already on your belt, right. What, do you expect to wear the belt under your other gear? Like you can just let 15+ 12mm grenades sang and dangle like a gansta or some shit? Yeah, good luck with that.
>Across your chest
If you think a there's enough room on the chest with everything else soldiers keep there, hell even with that rig in your pic, for even just TEN rail round boxes, let alone more, than you're fucking delusional.

Actually on that note, despite the original intention of continuing to tear apart your armchair general loadout, from available space to weight issue, I'm just stick with you don't know what they fuck your talking about and not waste my time on you any further. Take your late (You) and be gone.