Search - 4rchive

>>24811842
so anyway i was thinking of this "fundamental problem" of the feminist "mafia" that is the question of "system", and i proposed a definition of "system" as "little world" inspired by Wittgenstenian "limits of my language as limits of my world", the language being the "value system", this is not as important as the fact that it "dawned on me" the apparent equivalency of "little world" and "microcosm" which was to be instantly self-refuted": the difference between "little world" and "microcosm" is essential, for a "little world" is to be understood in light of Heidegger as this "horizon of encounter" between "Dasein" and "things", a "non-geometrical" limited "space" marked not by "extension" but "directionalities" unlike "neutral geometrical space", but the fundamental difference with the "microcosm" is the theoretical absence of a "macrocosm" it stands in a "logical-semiotic" relation to (and subsequentially the "fertility" or possiblity of a "micro-microcosm"); that is, i think, one of the overlooked differences between pre-modern and modern "ways of living": we "live in" "little worlds" we "carve" with our "industries (which Heidegger aptly describes in its "existential analysis") in order to "inhabit"; pre-modern man on the other hand "lives in" a microcosm (as described by Claude Levi-Strauss in his study of Amazonian tribes which he understands as "emiotically" structured societies where every aspect of life is a "sign" of a huge invisible "structure" or "system" equivalent to "the World", Eliade too understood this as a "layered ontology" where it's not mere recursion", there's specific "levels" to the thing", the primary one being the "household" or "home", the most important microcosmic level where by its "inhabitability" becomes the sapiential master key to the world; for (and this is the most salient point of my analysis) the "recursivity" of the "cosmos" is what makes "dwelling"/"inhabitablity" possible in the first place!)
that's what i learned today
i also came up with a funny Ambrose Bierce inspired aphorism: "Sex: what others have"