>>513003124
This is above her mind grade.
>she has seen evidence
Of what sort? Paperwork some mook filed? Video recordings? EM sensor data?
>credible people
What makes them credible exactly? Proximity to intelligence operations is the exact opposite of credible. Perhaps she is just credulous.
>they call them interdimensional beings
Who are they? Whoever they are I doubt they could offer even a rudimentary definition of a dimension that wasn't hilariously wrong.
>movements outside of time and space
And how would one measure or confirm this precisely? She's long on claims but short on specifics. Bring some actual evidence or piss off.
