>>719182961
>Gay characters that are ok
>Straight in everything but name
>Gay characters that are not ok
>may wear rainbow paraphernalia sometimes
This is absolutely correct though, not even homosexuals like gay characters that act and look like faggy flamer spawn from the deepest pits of hell that is california. Case in point: the "gay-appealing" art in >>719183304 and >>719183639 portraying conventionally masculine test dudes and not YASSS GWORL LET'S GO TO PRIDE SIS faggots