>>520892572
It's been a long time since I read on economic theory. Last time was during old /pol/ than I got distracted by the greatness that is logistics. I am not a persuasive person at all even after getting proven right time after time. Not that I haven't tried or that my council isn't good. The few people who did listen to me ended up doing VERY well for themselves. My advice is odd but strangely effective. Decentralization drew my attention as I noticed its ramifications and the undercurrents going on there. Along with key failure point of logistics and obvious economic mismanagement(aka parasitism via finance)
>>520892947
It's already been proven to be effective and there is no effective counter to it. Globohomo is far too good at subversion, destroying, and controlling opposition for anything else to be effective. If there were a better solution I wouldn't mind switching. I personally do not like the distinct lack of not leadership but inability to engage in diplomacy. I can understand going after one target but negotiations can enable those unrelate to GTFO without getting dragged into the mess.
My purpose behind it is simple. The total destruction of my enemies and the thriving of my people. I am not interested in mere victory or survival. Glowniggers like you think its possible to drown out resistance via further subversion and demographic replacement but than you run into the problems I listed in >>520871337. Replacements are incompetent, parasitic, and cowardly. Leadership is unnecessary, only a common enemy and mutual respect for our people. Demoralization also doesn't work otherwise, you wouldn't be trapped here fighting a impossible to win battle on the chans with shills that have been reduced into being pajeets the burnout is so extremely high.
The purpose should be obvious.