>>516669964
you're right that the burden of proof lies with anyone making positive truth claims. but you're mistaken if you think Christianity hasn't offered such proof, historical, philosophical, and existential.

take your comparison to islam. both systems claim divine revelation, but Christianity uniquely hinges on a falsifiable historical event: the resurrection of Jesus.
if it didn’t happen, Christianity collapses. that vulnerability invites scrutiny.

the quran's approach to prior scriptures differs significantly. surah 5:47 affirms the torah and gospel, yet it contradicts their core claims like Jesus’ divinity and crucifixion.

this creates a dilemma:
>if the torah and gospel were reliable when affirmed, islam undermines itself by rejecting their content.
>if they were corrupted beforehand, the quran is wrong to affirm them.

Christianity, by contrast, builds on the jewish scriptures without negating their core claims. it presents a coherent narrative of covenant, prophecy, and fulfillment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNAS0aaViM4