>>58259799
Admittingly true; the only real cost benefit I personally see is establishing a specific and regular nexus of networking rather than the relative nomadic nature we currently have.

Not that its a bad idea, I think it neat and novel; but its not without its own share of risks at the end of the day. I like what we have now because it's relatively anonymous, and it asks us individually to curate our own collections, and self regulate at no cost outside of personal time.

The only thing that it is ultimately bound to is the moods of the moderation, and of the level of self policing of our problem users who clearly have a specific interest in causing problems, or getting content that is charged in a completely different light that just so happens to be size related.

It would be genuinely nice however, to have a place where we could post size content that is both SFW/NSFW, have a regular artist on retainer, and shitpost about how "mods are being dicks on 4chan again" but I don't mind the lack thereof at the current time.

If the environment changes where it is no longer tolerable, perhaps I will even be the one to go forward with the upfront costs in migration simply because the ecosystem of 4chan wouldn't permit our nomadic tribal existence.

Who is to say?