>>9424
>to preserve my board, and 4chan as a whole, and part of that is removing things which imo are completely inimical to current board culture
>think frogs on /a/
>Basedjaks should be treated the same on /v/
This is way too complex an issue and I simply don't agree with it. Instead, I'd invite you, /a/ and /jp/ to open /biz/ and to:
>think frogs on /biz/
/a/ does have a template that allows one to wholesale remove catchphrase/unoriginal threads but it so happens to be mod only. Even if you were to get one on /v/, it would be mod only, you'd be joining your fellow /a/ janitors in asking mods to use it. Is this a good rule? Let's just say that if janitors have to enquire several times as to how/why something is or isn't /a/6, perhaps it's not one of the good ones.
>passable legitimate post
Quite frankly you acknowledge that no rules are being broken. There not being a global rule that allows us to get rid of those just for existing is a good thing, there's not enough of that on 4chan and it seriously hurts the consistency of moderation even within boards let alone across the whole website. Bad threads should be allowed to die naturally since embarassment is the most powerful dissuader, that's whole point of the olden tradition of posting after lurking.
