Search results for "b54bb4049ff8d40dfeb3ffa83a2d4eb0" in md5 (7)

/lit/ - Thread 24698619
Anonymous No.24698619
>It can be the case that one is unconscious of his Universal Will. He may believe, indeed, that it is directly opposed to his Will, even though it is his [true] Will. The criminal who is punished may wish, of course, that the punishment be warded off but the Universal Will brings with it the decree that the criminal shall be punished. It must be assumed that the Absolute Will of the criminal demands that he shall be punished. In so far as he is punished the demand is made that he shall see that he is punished justly and, if he sees this, although he may wish to be freed from the punishment as an external suffering yet, in so far as he concedes that he is justly punished, his Universal Will approves of the punishment.
/lit/ - Want to make someone mad? Become a metaphysician!
Anonymous No.24655680
>>24654751
>The first rule about metaphysics is that everyone who has actually tried it and created a truly all-encompassing systemic philosophy were laughably bad and did almost everything wrong.
fil. tered.
/lit/ - Thread 24562660
Anonymous No.24562660
>That the truth is only realised in the form of system, that substance is essentially subject, is expressed in the idea which represents the Absolute as Spirit (Geist) – the grandest conception of all, and one which is due to modern times and its religion. Spirit is alone Reality.
/lit/ - Thread 24550838
Anonymous No.24550838
tfw you realize the system isn't in a book; it's in your head.
/lit/ - Thread 24521824
Anonymous No.24521872
>>24521849
> Common sense cannot understand speculation; and what is more, it must come to hate speculation when it has experience of it; and, unless it is in the state of perfect indifference that security confers, it is bound to detest and persecute it.
/lit/ - Thread 24512977
Anonymous No.24513200
>>24513180
>When such minds commit themselves to the unrestrained ferment of sheer emotion, they think that, by putting a veil over self-consciousness, and surrendering all understanding, they are thus God’s beloved ones to whom He gives His wisdom in sleep. This is the reason, too, that in point of fact, what they do conceive and bring forth in sleep is dreams.
/lit/ - Thread 24513045
Anonymous No.24513045
Hegel was infinitely smarter than Schopes, and also the actually original thinker instead of a Hinduism shill with Western philosophical vocabulary.
S. was the better writer and polemicist tho
To some extent his vitriol against H was the narcissism of small differences, they're not as different as it seems, or rather S is a dialectical opposite to a supposedly Hegelian position which Hegel already sublated within his own work, if you actually study it.