>>520972080
being a society where not only do women hold and exert most of the decision-making power, but also this practice is accepted as normal and ordinary among the society's members.
The way things are heading, there does seem to be a chance of matriarchy developing out of the current state of affairs as women accrue ever greater wealth and influence relative to men, but I am skeptical that matriarchy is even possible, given the nature or constitution of the two sexes of humans, men and women, in light of how even the most materially and socially successful women still prefer to be under male leadership such that high-level women managers and executives still yearn to be able to turn to a man, who outranks them, before finally making a serious decision, and in how women, if there is not a higher-ranking man above them whom they can consult before finally making a major decision, will instead look to another authority to guide them (and to whom they can shift blame if their decision turns out to be mistaken), such as social convention or tradition or some school of thought like a religion, before making a major decision in the final stage of the whole decision-making process before the decision is finalized and the next step in the executive process is its implementation, or the enactment, institutionally or socially, or what the decision entails, where decisions are just instructions for institutional or social situations that are intended to be actualized or achieved (executed).
And those collective authorities high-ranking, powerful women turn to before making a final major decision, when they cannot find a man above them to consult and, in effect, make the decision for them (when women seem to be looking for a man's advice in making a serious decision, what they are really doing is not just looking for advice but instead they are effectively allowing, in fact asking or imploring, the man to make the decision himself such that the "powerful woman's