>>512798631
>You said that already. The proof you gave me to justify why it's wrong was I validated.
ln order for something normative to be "invalidated" an objective definition of morality must be given to show the example fails to adhere; what is your objective definition of good?
>So they were wrong about everything and we have correctly moved away from those many things, but this one thing they were 100% right on?
How do you know they were "wrong" about anything?