>>2836201
You're still trying to maintain that very same strawman:
A LED is not a lightbulp. It does not fail
>once or twice a year
properly engineered and supplied conservatively it will last a human lifetime. Like the good old red LED in a radio clock.
I don't even believe you're as much a moron as you're trying to make yourself appear as. Instead you're just trying for whatever reason to 'win' online arguments as if others didn't realise blatantly obvious flawed dialetic or whatever.
>>2836049
Sooo Anon. As stupid as it might be and as little reliability there might be in a camera producing an accurate depiction of lighting, I did get a few shots. I did everything I could to produce somehow reproducible and comparable results but you never know what a modern digital camera might do that you don't know about. Ask me to post them if interested, I'm not spamming the thread for 0 audience.