>>538049875
Kachina strong

>>535148249
I have evidence to the contrary submitted by a reliable source!

I know a better unit than Raiden.

>>533847702
Because a reputable source called her a brick.

>>532587083
According to this 100% accurate source, Raiden is a brick.

>>532457776
How viable would Raiden be as a brick for construction purposes?

>>532440212
Anon, we don't know if Aino is better than Raiden yet or not. Give it a week for the beta.
But we do know Kachina is better than Raiden.

>>532390205
He will buff Kachina instead

A reminder that Kachina is always right.

>>531857483
brick'd

>>531601524
T

>>531541023
I'm running a genuine meme set of full EM petra and it's been more useful than I ever would have expected. Crystallize shields suck but when she drags the crystals to herself it's a decent mini-shield to help mitigate damage, and 35% bonus damage for 10 seconds isn't bad at all.

Someone said brick?

>>530088658
Kachina.

What's a less bricked pull if my only DPS is Varesa
>Skirk without Escoffier but do have Furina+Charlotte
>Mavuika but my only other Natlan units are Iansan and Ororon

Prove her wrong. Go on, prove her wrong.

here's a truth nuke for you

>>528194210
>Raiden is not a brick.
According to a trustworthy source, she is a brick. Look at her and tell me she isn't trustworthy.

Prove this image wrong.

this is a better unit than raiden
Prove me wrong

i'm gonna shart.