>>40719388
I have not checked the sky in a while. There maybe more planets this time of year. I have not checked Stellarium in a while either.

I just used the Kelvin pic as a joke. The problem I was trying to resolve was calories to keep cool vs calories to keep warm. My intuition says that it should cost less extra calories to stay cool for the same deviation from body temperature. But that would just be numbers. The frame of reference matters also. For example, body temperature is not a comfortable ambient environmental temperature.

Access to calories matters also. Which means the heat of the environment is a factor in rendering calories. But more is not always better, which drags in the geography of the environment also.

tldr my intuition is that a warmer environment is better for life. It sounds like an obvious statement, but I feel its important to acknowledge more dynamics besides just temperature. My curiosity may just be pseudo intellectualism though. I tend to revisit resolved issues and 'discover' things new to me that are already established. For example, the unchecked replication and interaction of carbon and nitrogen molecules as precursors for life. A biochemist would already know that. But for a layperson like me, learning the dynamics from extrapolation seems like independent discovery. Same with this calorie/temperature issue.

Sorry. I didn't mean to textwall.