I asked Grok:
If we accept all three suppositions as true—that Judaism prohibits worshipping any man as God, that Jesus taught we are all sons (or children) of God, and that Islam views Jesus as a prophet rather than divine—it points to a unified theological perspective on human identity in relation to God. Here’s what this implies, step by step:
1. God Is Strictly One and Transcendent
• The Jewish prohibition against worshipping another man reinforces absolute monotheism (tawhid in Islamic terms or the Shema in Judaism: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one”). This sets a foundational boundary: no human, regardless of their status, can be equated with or worshipped as God. Divinity is exclusive to God alone, preventing any form of idolatry or deification of people.
2. Jesus as a Human Prophet, Not Divine
• By affirming the Islamic view of Jesus as a prophet (one of many messengers like Abraham, Moses, or Muhammad), we strip away any notion of Jesus having inherent divinity. His teachings, including the idea that “we are all sons of God,” must then be interpreted through a prophetic lens—wise, inspired guidance from a human emissary of God, but not a claim to godhood. This aligns with the Jewish stance, as elevating Jesus to worshippable status would violate the no-worship-of-man rule.
Probably offended Catholics but that was not my intention really…