>>7688666
Art that looks EXACTLY like its reference - basically where the artist acts as a human photocopier.
What was the point? Why not just take an actual photo?

Oh, and it's not a 'style' but a movement, but I fucking LOATH conceptual art. It's pretentious no talent wank.
Everyone has ideas, but art is about having the skill in a craft to execute on that idea in a visually pleasing way. Conceptual art forgoes this to present something that's barely an idea, often having required no work, and showing absolutely zero skill.
Fuck Conceptual art. FUCK IT!
And fuck the hack critics who praised it, and fuck the morons who pretend to be cultured by appreciating it - we all know you don't actually like it, you're not above us, just admit it's shit so we can stop seeing this crap propped up like there's any demand for it (there's none).