>>512775022
> Nothing wrong with having sex with a child. If there is no coercion or injury during the act of sex, then no one gets harmed at all.
1. It's possible to injure small children via intercourse. With very young children it is not uncommon, and such injuries can lead to death. So it is irresponsible of you to make blanket claims like
> nothing wrong with having sex with a child
when normal intercourse is risky.
2. There are more ways to 'harm' a child than physically through sex. Coercion, emotional manipulation, using one's authority, brainwashing, etc. are all ways of getting a kid to do something they don't want to do, which they may later regret and feel bad about. By framing harm entirely as a physical process, you overlook other harms that can be as important or even more important.
This is why I argued specifically for 10+ with special protections. Because it's not as simple as you say. And everyone knows that, so when you talk out of your ass you're not doing yourself or your cause any favors.
