>>510003507
Can it truly be called a war when both sides are ultimately entangled in the same global financial networks, and the conflict itself serves broader strategic and economic agendas?
What we’re witnessing in Ukraine isn’t just a geopolitical confrontation—it’s also a financial restructuring, where Western support comes in the form of massive loans and military aid that will saddle the country with long-term debt. When Ukraine eventually becomes a key supplier of energy to Europe, that debt will be repaid not in silence, but through inflated prices—energy sold at a premium, justified by “reconstruction” and “defense.” Meanwhile, this keeps Middle Eastern oil—particularly from Saudi Arabia—competitive in Western Europe.
In this context, the sabotage of Nord Stream 2 was not just an act of aggression; it was a pivotal economic maneuver. By severing Europe from cheap and abundant Russian gas, it forced the continent into deeper energy dependency on U.S.-aligned suppliers. This move reinforced the position of the petrodollar system, ensuring that global energy transactions remain tied to the U.S. dollar and that Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, retain leverage.
With Europe economically weakened and energy-insecure, it becomes a more obedient conduit for American foreign policy. This, in turn, strengthens the West’s position in Africa, where European states—acting as proxies—extend economic and military influence under the guise of aid, security, and development.
The war becomes less about territory and ideology, and more about resource control, currency dominance, and maintaining a global order that extracts value through debt, dependency, and manufactured scarcity.
I am telling you the American political class are all Jews and are the enemy of white European man.