>>24843490
All metaphysical proofs of God (supposing their argument can be made logically sound with modern logic, which is also not trivial) just end up proving the unity of existence. You just end up proving a Platonic or Spinozist god, an unconditioned absolute that does not require prayer, faith, or sacrifices. Nothing in the proofs results in having to commit to any religious tenets.
Lastly, these Spinozist/Platonist proofs have to deal with the contention that Kant is right and all that these proofs are doing is falsely extrapolating the unity conditioning our subjective experience to all of reality.

So summarized:
1. The classical versions of these proofs are not logically valid
2. if made logically valid, as i.e Godel has attempted, they end up proving a rational ordering principle that does not require faith.
3. this rational ordering principle might not be a feature of reality but of our preconditions for subjective experience.