>>514943177
>I think there's evidence that religion does not actually impact human behavior that much, it's mostly genetics. But over time religion does impact the genetics.
Astute observation. Very true.
>the most devout, have the most kids, which means our population is more religious every generation. It's almost like it's enslaving us.
This is true for any religion. Take Orthodox Jews and Muslims for an example. A huge part of religion in general is about child-rearing. I think the rise of secularism will always correlate with lacking fertility. It's not a problem to be solved except by just becoming religious.
>you need to cultivate an elite culture that supports this taste in opinion. Art, music, novels, journals....etc. That's what forms their taste.
I wish he had more magazines and printed journals. Things that could be held and kept as actual keepsakes instead of the endless stream of internet content made by e-celebs.