>>2830014
>lmao
are you faking confidence here by assuming a position of authority? deflecting social rebukes? noting that you're joking in advance to express uncertainty of your subsequent assertion? mocking my presumable fallibility?

just so you know, my interpretation of "lmao" at the beginning of a response in a contentious conversation is that you think it bolsters your case; a kind of "shock and awe" approach to defeating your enemy in a debate. this is an tactic of low efficacy, which is what i'm asking you to expand on your meaning.

that being said, i'm going to respond with my own interpretation and you correct me if i have misinterpreted your tone.

> out competed
this is not how the jew is in control. the jew is genetically inferior to europeans. before you go on with the common fallacious responses to this assertion, ask yourself: does the best product always win in the "free market"? the answer is no. this was proven repeatedly in the 90s and 00s, and these days the intellectual property theft machine that the jew runs has gotten more sophisticated, so the better ideas are stolen faster and pumped into an industrial complex that average people simply do not have access to, so you'd have to gaslight everyone into thinking they have access to industry that they don't have access to if you wish to counter this argument. also, you'll have to look into christians giving jews their money and the non-linear correlation in gambling time with respect to the amount of money a gambler has to understand how an inferior ethnicity can stay on top. jews are not just inferior, but they are below average genetic stock.

> don't try to act as if your way of seeing the world/people is any different from Jews.
explain what you think this should mean to me.

anyway, philippines is a lost cause and everyone should abandon ship. you're going to have to fight the jew if you want the social rot to decay away and the healing to begin in 100-200 years from now.