>>716343739
>>716343814
A. This isn't actually a proeminent issue, can you name any creators who have a significant platform with a juvenile audience who also have an Onlyfans and promote it to their underage audience?
B. To the extent that this does happen, it isn't as harmful because as I explained Onlyfans as a platform isn't targeted at children like video games are. Children aren't hanging around the Onlyfans frontpage like they are potentially hanging around the Steam and itch.io storefronts.
>>716343846
>anyone with a fucking phone and a credit card can access onylfans
So, not children.