>>718007708
There's some image out there of a post analysing this, and it takes way too long to say it, but the basic point is that these are feminist attempts at making a new masculinity. These are chaste, sexless men, whose only job/role is to be providers and protectors, and to apparently have no will or internal drive of their own, and no wants or desires outside of "provider".

Seeing this as something created by women and their male "allies", you see this is an obvious scam/grift. Yes, it'd be great if you had an entire class of people who were just serving you hand over foot.

so just a more muscular version of the "man child".