>>513223563
>race-based
He actually said partisan gerrymandering which is okay, now. Texas is doing the same thing, so I'm not sure how you'd argue they couldn't or prove otherwise?

I'm beginning to think the reason you guys haven't though of how this all ends, is because you're deeply out-of-touch with reality? Or show me where he said it would be race-based? Prove you're not a shill, and can actually go off script.