>>151192775
>If Trump is in the files
This is already a bullshit premise for his guilt because we've known for years he went out of his way to talk to the FBI about what he thought were shady things about Epstein (when most celebrities refused). So because of that he is almost certainly in the "files".
Epstein's main accomplice was questioned by feds and explicitly said she never saw Trump do anything bad, but for that alone his name would still be in the files.
But because "ORANGE MAN BAD" obsessives never think critically of basic things like "why is Trump in the files?" they will ignore if his name appears in a way that is in his favor and will just be conditioned to spam "TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES". This is similar to how they spam "TRUMP IS A CONVICTED FELON" but don't even stop to think what the convictions are. Go ahead and ask anyone spamming "34 CONVICTIONS" what the 34 convictions are and they will never be able to answer. They just know "34 CONVICTIONS" sounds bad and is convenient ammo to use in their neverending Trump Derangement Syndrome obsession.