>>64406744
Your pic (you could have linked a source btw) shows that in 47% of cases more than 3 rounds were needed; what I just circled is not an outlier, you imbecile. BTW, I know you failed middle school math, but when the decimal is .5 or higher, you round up, not round down. Great job moving the goalpost from "more rounds are not needed" to "it's 7, not 8. WAH!" when your own pic proves you wrong. LOL