>>513806680
> Releasing the list to the public is not necessary to prosecute these people, if such a list, in fact, exists.
Where are the prosecutions then? There is convict-able evidence of 100s of underage girls sexually abused by many "powerful" men besides Epstein himself. > (Source: Maxwell conviction, multiple victim testimony, civil court filings)
So who were those "powerful" men that also "sexually abused" those 100s of girls? If you went through the evidence that exists (cite: sources in greentext) but for some reason is not being released (those are the "files" we are asking about) and wrote down the names of "powerful" men that sexually "abused" the underage girls, that would be the "list" You Fucking Imbecile.