>>546344971
>Lol he's still sore about trying to use the revenue chart as a gotcha, only for people to point out that the three years where 3H got 20+ units had the lowest levels of decline, and the three years where 3H got scraps had the highest levels of decline, with decline being worse the more Engage units they release in a given year.

>>546344824
>Relevance?

>>546344821
>Are you trying to farm for replies? Because there's nobody here that would deny you're a whiny entitled manchild crybaby literally begging for a resplendent of a literal who dyke every 2 weeks

>>546344782
>That's all you do KEEEEEEEEEK

>>546344782
>Yes? Whiny retard