>>521070293
No it's not. The temperature was wrong the entire time. Model references and assumptions don't count as empirical evidence.

"boats" don't prove anything. You're using a perspective error and trying to claim it counts as empirical evidence.

See, you don't know how many wobbles there are. This is why you people suffer trying to "prove" the magic masonic globe.

I'm so glad people like you got vaccinated.

>>41293633
>we lost the tech

>>514659135
I hope they didn’t lose all her coding documents along with all the other Apollo data.
QRD: More fakery

>>510987248
this.
they apparently also lost the footage in the radiation so they had to fake it

>>508910593
Imagine being a boomer. The most gullible, kike loving generation to have ever existed.