>>513037252
No it fucking wasn't the original was posted on /g/ straight from the Twitter thread and someone noticed the line was wavy then people started calling it out. Holy shit now it's devolving into conspiracy theories. Even random people when this was spammed would call it out in passing. Just run a basic error level analysis and it returns results of excessive filter use. Unless you're going to tell me that the original photo on twitter was deliberately doctored as part of a grand plan to have people point out the obvious filter?

>>23108273
No it fucking wasn't the original was posted on /g/ straight from the Twitter thread and someone noticed the line was wavy then people started calling it out. Holy shit now it's devolving into conspiracy theories. Even random people when this was spammed would call it out in passing. Just run a basic error level analysis and it returns results of excessive filter use. Unless you're going to tell me that the original photo on twitter was deliberately doctored as part of a grand plan to have people point out the obvious filter?

>>213787717
You can run an error level analysis if you want to get autistic about it, but yes even if you want to discredit the obvious warped wall behind her. Although my first reaction was damn Asian women really don't hit the wall, they hit the wall back.

>>23106108
You can run an error level analysis if you want to get autistic about it, but yes even if you want to discredit the obvious warped wall behind her. Although my first reaction was damn Asian women really don't hit the wall, they hit the wall back.