>>24844308
>redditor can't help but froth at the mouth and reply like a retard
Lol. Keep seething. Literature requires braincells which you don't have. Don't speak for intelligent people when you're the exact opposite of it. You're so retarded the use of glaucoma as a metaphor there still doesn't make sense to your retarded ass LOL. This whole thread is just one retarded person being massively in denial that he is too retarded to read and understand good literature.
4chan Search
3 results for "c3c68e934a4d77dfc36751c53b33e166"
>>24805195
Lol.
Lol.
>>24542456
>The whole point of the book was for it to be interpreted by readers.
Congrats on finally getting it. The abject hypocrisy in this post is something. The most vapid reader in the thread who couldn't make anything of the book beyond what the two HS papers told him to is talking about deeper reading. While trying his level best to deflect away from interpreting a famous story from the book. No no, it's the book's fault for this reader being a retard and a coward. It's like even your two braincells are underdeveloped.
>The whole point of the book was for it to be interpreted by readers.
Congrats on finally getting it. The abject hypocrisy in this post is something. The most vapid reader in the thread who couldn't make anything of the book beyond what the two HS papers told him to is talking about deeper reading. While trying his level best to deflect away from interpreting a famous story from the book. No no, it's the book's fault for this reader being a retard and a coward. It's like even your two braincells are underdeveloped.