>>514104121
I'm usually not the guy to sperg out on history with this
>ackshaully there is a way earlier precedent because in 1267, after the 4th Bumfuckopolisian council King Fickwinzlaus XIX. ratified...

Johnson for sure was an important milestone but it was not the turning point.
Jewish influence grew steadily for almost 150 years. And while, for example, most conservative politicians would continue to be outraged in private, they could have stopped the cancerous menace at any point. The didn't though, they never did.

Johnson was a total zio lackey, agreed, but look at the Nixon protocols, even the debacle of Bush senior which might have been the historical endpoint of potential conservative resistance.
The slow and gradual buildup of zio influence created the post ww2 world order we grew up in. They are now so in control that high ranking politicians will openly praise israel in the most fiery, ultra-nationalist tones while acting confused and decontructive as to their own race.

Once more, this happened gradually and steadily.
Other than ww2, searching for a cause will go nowhere as it was the opposite:
What never happened at any point in time in all the anglo-saxon countries was any sort of resistance. Rather than a handful of key shabbos goys it was this tradition of continuous apathy, a well-managed culture of just standing by and being content with material bullshit which caused the downfall of our race.
The proper question would be
>what's the underlying cause of our insane liberal, aracial tradition?
which leads one towards
>what is judeo-christianity?