>>512434398
Become so degenerate that merely looking up my mere internet search history demoralizes federal agents so badly they are put into an 6-month psychiatric recovery treatment.
Eventually, I am hoping to pass the techno-degenerate border so that I may demoralize automated AI systems as well.
4chan Search
3 results for "c61f71f4f5d41e85a5795389e979a0ea"
>>512274621
>they still went well out of their way to repeatedly defend and enable jews at every possible step
Well duh. Abrahamists gonna cuck to other abrahamists.
Judaism is really just a plagiarized feminine heresy/subversion of greek Platonism, applied as a parasitic group evolutionary strategy.
Early christianity is a greek-hero inspired heresy of judaism that was meant to reform the destructive behaviour of jews and middle eastern peasants. Jesus Christ's literal message (as in, what he literally said) is an inversion of the classical greek aristocratic hero story of "Do great deeds/Take all responsibility!" into "Do no harm/Take responsibility for your compassion, let god handle the rest!".
It was later co-opted by the jews (Saul of Tarsus) and utilized as a subversive woman-slave religion to undermine roman aristocratic rule and authority.
Aurelian recognized during the crisis of the 3rd century that the concept of a loving, universal god was necessary to regulate the lower classes (slaves made up 25% of the empire population by this period), so he created the patriarchal cult of SOL, the benevolent sun-father. After his death, this invention was later subverted/integrated into the existing christian mythos (which is why we celebrate Sol=Christ's birth on December 25th).
Later roman emperors instituted christianity as state religion for the sake of power/stability, similiar to how politicians and corporations institute woke/feminist rituals in their domains.
Islam developed as an arab nationalist heresy of christianity/judaism.
Marxism, feminism and woke are modern heresy's of christianity that conceil their abrahamic baggage (i.e. lies) by pretending to be "science".
Modern scientism and mainstream atheism (le heckin' science!) are themselves neo-platonically/abrahamically subverted skinsuits of aristotelian/aryan/empirical/logical methodology and testimony.
The more you know...
>they still went well out of their way to repeatedly defend and enable jews at every possible step
Well duh. Abrahamists gonna cuck to other abrahamists.
Judaism is really just a plagiarized feminine heresy/subversion of greek Platonism, applied as a parasitic group evolutionary strategy.
Early christianity is a greek-hero inspired heresy of judaism that was meant to reform the destructive behaviour of jews and middle eastern peasants. Jesus Christ's literal message (as in, what he literally said) is an inversion of the classical greek aristocratic hero story of "Do great deeds/Take all responsibility!" into "Do no harm/Take responsibility for your compassion, let god handle the rest!".
It was later co-opted by the jews (Saul of Tarsus) and utilized as a subversive woman-slave religion to undermine roman aristocratic rule and authority.
Aurelian recognized during the crisis of the 3rd century that the concept of a loving, universal god was necessary to regulate the lower classes (slaves made up 25% of the empire population by this period), so he created the patriarchal cult of SOL, the benevolent sun-father. After his death, this invention was later subverted/integrated into the existing christian mythos (which is why we celebrate Sol=Christ's birth on December 25th).
Later roman emperors instituted christianity as state religion for the sake of power/stability, similiar to how politicians and corporations institute woke/feminist rituals in their domains.
Islam developed as an arab nationalist heresy of christianity/judaism.
Marxism, feminism and woke are modern heresy's of christianity that conceil their abrahamic baggage (i.e. lies) by pretending to be "science".
Modern scientism and mainstream atheism (le heckin' science!) are themselves neo-platonically/abrahamically subverted skinsuits of aristotelian/aryan/empirical/logical methodology and testimony.
The more you know...
>>510489624
The female "Lunar" strategy, emerging at the dawn of the agrarian age, is embodied most clearly in the hypothesized “Old European” cultures of the Neolithic period, center on covert social control, consensus-based organization, emotional cohesion, and a high degree of female sexual selection. Its mode of power operates through shame, gossip, moral signaling, and control over access to reproduction and resources via social consensus. It tends toward egalitarian, low-conflict societies that optimize for stability and survival rather than expansion or innovation. In evolutionary terms, it can be stable and self-reinforcing as long as there is ample access to food (aka agriculture)—but this comes at the cost of long-term adaptability, vigor, resilience and technological dynamism.
In contrast, the masculine "Solar" strategy is what we will call that which emerged from the Indo-European, Greco-Roman, and later Western cultures. It is overtly hierarchical, patriarchal, and expansionist, characterized by law, warfare, transcendental order, and long-term orientation. It prioritizes structure, discipline, and legacy—often expressed through state-building, military conquest, and technological advancement. This strategy sacrifices short-term consensus for long-term complexity and scalability, enabling high-energy civilizations capable of transformation and resilience under stress. It is also deeply reproductive in its imperatives, aligning social structure with the goal of generational continuity. It emerged from the now-Ukrainian steppe as an environmental adaptation to pastoral living, in contrast to the neolithic agrarian "luna(r)-tics".
The female "Lunar" strategy, emerging at the dawn of the agrarian age, is embodied most clearly in the hypothesized “Old European” cultures of the Neolithic period, center on covert social control, consensus-based organization, emotional cohesion, and a high degree of female sexual selection. Its mode of power operates through shame, gossip, moral signaling, and control over access to reproduction and resources via social consensus. It tends toward egalitarian, low-conflict societies that optimize for stability and survival rather than expansion or innovation. In evolutionary terms, it can be stable and self-reinforcing as long as there is ample access to food (aka agriculture)—but this comes at the cost of long-term adaptability, vigor, resilience and technological dynamism.
In contrast, the masculine "Solar" strategy is what we will call that which emerged from the Indo-European, Greco-Roman, and later Western cultures. It is overtly hierarchical, patriarchal, and expansionist, characterized by law, warfare, transcendental order, and long-term orientation. It prioritizes structure, discipline, and legacy—often expressed through state-building, military conquest, and technological advancement. This strategy sacrifices short-term consensus for long-term complexity and scalability, enabling high-energy civilizations capable of transformation and resilience under stress. It is also deeply reproductive in its imperatives, aligning social structure with the goal of generational continuity. It emerged from the now-Ukrainian steppe as an environmental adaptation to pastoral living, in contrast to the neolithic agrarian "luna(r)-tics".