>>18090664
>I accept your defeat.
What you're asking for is impossible you absolute moron. for a house to servive from the Middle Ages to now it has to be restored, renovated in some way. For instance, picrel is an actual German house built in 1292 but it's been renovated and restored so many times that it would have looked quite different in 1292. The current building is more how it looked in the 16th century after undergoing renovations.
I'm sorry if you are too dumb to understand the process of wear and tear on old structures especially fucking wattle and daub ones.
Again there's no defeat because you are the one denying archaeologists like a fucking flat earther. This is called an Argument from incredulity, you don't understand how archaeologists figure out how a historic building looked therefore you don't believe it and trust it as evidence. You are denying science you lose this argument by default on this premise alone.