>>543361882
its called glamourer, and yea for screenshots related to the hair to post here, I'm not running around with it on or ERPing with it
why are you being so disingenuous about this, it's like I post something and you twist it into the worst way possible without giving me any grace
>>543361909
yea possibly true, we'll have to see, there's a lot that goes into economics
take into account people undercutting and it could crash for stupid reasons