>Never believe that the anti Chloe trolls are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge.
>But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Chloe have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors.
>They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

>Ah, it’s not that hard really. Actual info and digging is happening here. Fanart spam and obsessing over the same devs they managed to memorize from LinkedIn - over there

>starting to feel like it’s just one unhinged person behind all that. you don’t collectively obsess over a couple devs for years and still not understand their roles or contributions. it’s all surface-level stuff - resumes, recs, interviews

>The other thread is just LRfags seething and image spamming because they couldn’t handle that someone didn’t put an off topic game in the op.

>When you still think the focus group is just a /r/pricefield satellite

They are so arrogant. If they actually were smart folks, they would share a lot of their "findings" here, I did welcome the geoloc anon yet those folks seems so fragile in the way they react, it reminds me of a fourteen year old who think has the world figured out because he's terminally online and can brag about stuff the "average normie" doesn't know. Do me a favour and be humble for one sec

>>543033504
>pointing facts is now seen as seething
We know you game anon, you have nothing to say anymore