>>11356174
>My question is, when a slave voluntarily submits herself to slavery, who receives the funds from the transaction?
Historically speaking, some slavery was closer to "indentured servitude" where the "slave" had a contract
Could be that when someone sells themselves into slavery, a certain amount of funds become attached to their contract to be released to the slave at the end of their contract
also historically speaking, many indentured servants were abused or loopholes in the contracts were exploited, so who knows if they would ever get those funds or if the funds would just go directly to their owners...