>>514736673
>These dudes wouldnt let their women vote which war theyll be drafted to fight in.
Because they're not cucks like western SIMP-daddies. They know females are used for barter, not for legacy. That's what son's are for.

>>513823176
Can't do anything about it because females are the majority electorate and the status quo is what they prefer. And along with their SIMP armies and SIMP-daddies, nothing will alter the status quo but a natural disaster like an asteroid impact, solar flar/emp, or something like that.

>>512018458
Found a SIMP-daddy.

OP is a SIMP-daddy terrified of another man plowing his princess across the carpet; because he can't.

>>510944662
She could pop out of the womb as a 20yo trad wife. She will still inevitably become a dumb worthless whore. But here's the white pill. It doesn't matter. Because your legacy isn't your daughter, your legacy is your son. Your daughter is just an orifice to bargain for family wealth. Most men forgot that and wrongly think they need to raise little Princess to fulfill her every dream of travel, sex, excitement, autonomy, etc. No, your daughter is supposed to be bargained for generational wealth. SIMP-daddies need to put their egos aside and sell their daughter to invest in their legacy (their sons).