>>520815106
Curious, the only relevant leaks I've seen were the nicknames and their associate e-mail accounts (some of them with seemingly real names on gmail), but the one image where these were compiled also listed an enterprise-level LAN IP range as an undeniable proof of glowie involvement, so I wouldn't trust that particular image/investigation too much, and am too lazy to dig through the social media profiles of other individuals mentioned there to at least ascertain the veracity of those.
That pic did show some retired "intelligence" officer, but just how intelligent was he to use a mail address with his real name on it on an imageboard? Seemed odd. Then again, not all psyops are orchestrated by smart people.