>>215755238
>some of their constitutions literally with no unclear language say to uphold the values of socialism
bill gates says the same thing.
Again, I'm awe-struck that you don't find imperialism of a global scale to be globalist. We don't simply extract thirdie resources, we're (or were) building a web of ideologically aligned governments across the planet
>No they think globalism is socialism
Be honest, I'm sure you understand the difference between the bill gates/WEF/tranny socialism, and the socialism of the rest of the world, which could colloquially be called national socialism.
>And the US doesn't rule the world after 2008, neoliberalism de facto failed
I was oversimplifying when I said the US still "rules" the world, it seems that we agree.
>Chinese want to cling onto it
This is a cope that was latched onto once China proved its potential. The CCP owns all their land and resources, and has a heavy hand in their private sector. It'd be a great feat of mental/linguistic gymnastics to call them neolib's.
>Russia vs the US is still the primary conflict
>I find it hard to take what's essentially a development project seriously
Our understandings of the world are FAR too different to reconcile in this thread.