>>64399100
>r. The ACR program's testing methodology was incredibly faulty and its criteria for success unrealistically high, the 100% P(H) impovement requirement
Funny thing is that basic M16A2 met that requirement during trials.
Imagine how stupid all people who wrote about ACR programs before results nvke drop looked like.

>and the fact they decided that optical sights offered no advantage over irons should tell you as much.
Another case of lolcows writing about ACR
>optics are best thing evah!
Where did you get this?
>ummm i made it up...