>>107163141
>However it still doesn't change it that GPL has effectively zero power against tech giants
Deboonked
https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL%20Enforcement%20Cases
Also, OpenWRT only exists thanks to a successful GPL enforcement.
>Cisco has agreed to appoint a Free Software Director for Linksys, a subsidiary of Cisco, to supervise Linksys' compliance with the requirements of free software licenses such as the GPL (the GNU General Public License).
>In addition, Cisco will continue to make the complete and corresponding source code for versions of FSF programs used with current Linksys products freely available on its website. Cisco will also make a monetary contribution to the FSF.
https://www.fsf.org/news/2009-05-cisco-settlement.html
>The OpenWrt project started in January 2004. The first OpenWrt versions were based on Linksys GPL sources for WRT54G and a buildroot from the uClibc project. This version was known as OpenWrt stable release and was widely in use.
https://openwrt.org/about/history
Whereas with cuck licenses, you have shit like MINIX -> Intel Management Engine (Spyware).
>Some people have pointed out online that if MINIX had a GPL license, Intel might not have used it since then it would have had to publish the modifications to the code. Maybe yes, maybe no, but the modifications were no doubt technical issues involving which mode processes run in, etc. My understanding, however, is that the small size and modular microkernel structure were the primary attractions. Many people (including me) don't like the idea of an all-powerful management engine in there at all (since it is a possible security hole and a dangerous idea in the first place), but that is Intel's business decision and a separate issue from the code it runs.
https://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/intel/
So:
GPL = More Freedom
Cuck licenses = More Slavery
Shrimple as.
4chan Search
4 results for "c9e15c1600b1115ddf8b8f40d7e6686b"
