>>23189948
>nothing i've said has been wrong

left melty cope

>i've cited actual sources that prove you wrong and you don't accept them lol

you cited one broad statistic and I proved getting rid of guns wouldn't make that number go down or make the USA any safer and I backed that up with sources and percentages

>that's why i said mass shootings and not school shootings you utter moron

picrel such mass, much problem . lol get real 4 mfs, the UK had 1 mass stabbing.. so we have them beat by a whopping 3 people who also only killed about 4 people each (one guy zero..) much problem such mass.. totally justfys a police state much logic

maybe we just shouldn't let the 4 troons (literally) that did this own guns and do better background checks. Like I said freedom>safety. Even if a mass shooting happened it wouldn't change my opinion on that and overall STATISTICS PROVE removing guns WOULDNT MAKE IT ANY SAFER IN GENERAL.. it might stop mass shootings but like I said if someone wants to kill on mass they will (the UK still has what we have, get similar death numbers.. bombs are easy to make.. look at the middle east lol)

>5% of 12% of 50% of 100% of what you say is retarded

Jesus Christ you're retarded and I bet you really thought you understood something without actually getting it.. yes anon people will still be murdered without guns.. the number you are looking for is 5%..

>thank you for admitting i'm right

what does Americans being naturally feral have to do with guns? Like I said 5% it wouldn't change anything, 5% of homicides are done with guns that were legally purchased

the risk of a police state don't outweigh getting rid of a easily replaced medium