>>521197359
>Presumably everyone gets allocated an allotment of money annually that gets printed out of thin air.
Could you define the allocation process? Let's assume we could find some fair exchange process, how would you then determine the value of something someone would purchase?
> Because every country will have to do this eventually, it won't be seen as economically disastrous like it would nowadays.
It's economically disastrous because I don't think you could reliably stabilize pricing of physical "things."
> It's the post-scarcity society that Star Trek always predicted, money becomes meaningless, work is optional.
It would still have to be a control on how much "activity" can go on.

>>520163915
I mean, if we didn't have to bother with deporting them and just throwing them out of airplanes it could go a little quicker.

>>519758767
It's money that can be spent instead of being locked up in the government.
It creating value, moron.