>>719180528
>The very nature of interactivity in contrary to a "good" story.
Your argument is invalid and relies on the "viewer" or "player" being a disingenuous asshole or a complete and utter retard, and if we apply that same standard to books then they're also unable to be good because there's this hypothetical reader and viewer who will stop the movie midway and laugh at how stupid the actors look mid-shot and who will intentionally misinterpret the books themes.
Adding to that Games are sometimes even better then books or readers because a game can actively call out the player for their behaviour which contrary to your argument makes games better then books and movies because it addresses the viewer whereas a book is incapable of that
One of the best examples of that in my opinion is undertale in how if a retarded faggot decided to kill toriel and then reset to "prove" that "it's just a game lmao it can't react lmao, mercy and whatnot don't matter etc" flowy calls you out on that.